Hipstamatic

Delmar Loop

I’m totally digging the Hipstamatic app for the iPhone. It’s a recreation of a camera developed in the great wilderness of Wisconsin in the early 80s by two brothers. The whole story is being kept alive by the older brother of the two Hipstamatic creators.

Ted Drewes

The app is very slick and plays a great homage to the cheap all-plastic cameras of yore. With the tiny viewfinder, different films and lenses and the always different results it’s a blast to watch your photos ‘develop’.

Amber Window

The best thing about the app for me is the high-pitched whirring of the flash when you turn it on. Perfect.

Silhouette

A Post in Which I Claim to Have Predicted the Future

Nearly a year ago I wrote a blathering rant about how the common aspect ratios of video is largely irrelevant on the web. To quote myself:

Television has set the standard of common resolutions and aspect ratios for years, but not everything seems as smooth as it should. For one as we are becoming increasingly more web-centric in our distribution models why are we sticking by these ancient limitations of size and shape.  Isn’t there something inherently more flexible with the web? Let’s challenge those norms and create something new with video.

And then today I saw these:

Interesting, no?

Update: I clicked around a littler further and found the blog of the creator of the second video. On Jesse Rosten’s blog he shares very similar thoughts regarding nontraditional video.

The Courier That Never Arrived.

Microsofts Courier digital journal: exclusive pictures and details

Gruber:

It’s a demo of a concept. I’d wager money that we’ll never see an actual product from Microsoft that works like this.

I think the Courier demo is really, really neat. Watching that video makes me want one, now. Unfortunately it will never be as cool as what we’re seeing in these videos.

That’s a big difference between Apple and other tech companies. They demo a product a few months before it ships, in it’s near final form. Microsoft announces products years beforehand and by the time it arrives it’s behind the curve.

Getting the Word Out About Palm

Palm’s CEO wrote an internal message to the company’s employees after finical forecasts were deemed to be less than what was hoped. My favorite quote:

“You may have also seen a growing number of Palm ads on billboards, bus shelters, buses, and subway stations—all getting the word out about Palm.”

No mention of online advertising or even television? What is Palm doing in the advertising channels potential customers might actually see?

I really would like to see Palm succeed, they have a nice product and a great history.

You’re Doing it Wrong Stupid

I just read this insightful post over on Ed Finkler’s blog Funkatron about the issue of whether or not people are too dumb or technology is too confusing.

What I’ve learned from interacting with most computer users, though, is that they do not give a rat’s ass about how computers work. They want to accomplish certain tasks, and will do this in the way that is most sensible and direct for them. And the way they end up accomplishing these tasks within the multitasking window motif is typically not the way I would do it.

The question being asked is ‘Who’s fault is this?’

Some would argue that it’s users fault, people don’t care enough or aren’t interested in learning more about how technology works. Others say that developers are to blame for making technology far too complicated.

I’ve been thinking a lot about this recently myself, we just finished a re-design of our website at work and I’ll soon be launching a mobile application as well. Both of these projects have very specific UI requirements and both projects have generated numerous hours of discussion and deliberation on how to most appropriately display our content.

So when we flip the switch and share our creations with the masses, who’s to blame when people are confused or upset?

My friend Tim and I have been busting each others chops over Apple vs Microsoft in regard to their differentiating paradigms of window management. As he told me once, “I don’t know how many times I’ve sat down at a public use Mac in a lab somewhere with all windows closed but 15 apps running.”

And he’s right, this is very confusing. And it’s coming from Apple, a company lauded for their slick user experiences. Who’s to blame?

Anecdotal Side Story

I know a professional who uses a computer for a large portion of her job. She sits in front of her computer the entire day. She’s not a power user, but the tasks she has on her plate all revolve around the daily use of various programs. Info management systems, email, browsing the web, web content creation, to name a few.

What’s interesting is how he interfaces with the computer. She uses her mouse rotated 180 degrees so that the buttons are at the bottom. Somehow, at some point in the past she sat down and started using a computer this way. She uses her fingers to grip the bottom edge of the mouse and clicks the ‘right’ button for  a left-click.

Is she doing it wrong? Why does she do this? Who, if anyone, taught her? Who’s ‘fault’ is it that she does this?

There’s no harm in how she’s doing it. There’s no advantage to teach her how to do it differently. There’s nothing gained professionally if she learns a new way.

As I’ve grown older and entered the world of professionals I have realized that all those dry cut things we were taught growing up are much more fuzzy.

Politics, bureaucracy, limitation of resources, available time  – all contribute to the mired relationship of technology and people. Everyone is to blame/no one is to blame.

It’s a series of large and small events that cascade to to the present situation. How we deal with it moving forward is the interesting part.