As popular as ham radio

Photography as a hobby is a shrinking circle. It won’t ever go away, but it is much smaller than it ever was. I was reading this post from Mike Johnston, The Online Photographer and a few bits stood out to me from the post and comments.

Even if times really are changing, and people just aren’t interested in new cameras and better specs as much as they used to be, it doesn’t really matter that much. Here’s the thing: dedicated photographers are outsiders. I’ve always looked at us that way. We’re not attached to the industry; we’re not affected by fashions. We’re not driven by mass taste. We go our own way. We do our own thing.

As many middle-aged hipsters will attest, I love not doing mainstream hobbies. Even while I also love doing many other mainstream things. Photography is not mainstream and you can consider it outsider-ish, but at the same time more people have cameras – in their phones – than they have ever had stand-alone cameras! It’s the most mainstream thing you can think of!

It’s mainstream and outsider at the same time. To be human is to contain multitudes.

Another quote:

It’s clear to me that we’re in the sad twilight of the era of photography as a serious hobby. It’s rapidly heading for the same category as ham radio or model railroading: a quirky, shrinking tiny niche, regarded (if at all) with a flicker of tolerant amusement by the masses. I derived immense satisfaction and not a little joy from several decades spent honing my technical skills, learning how to use finicky gear, and teasing the best possible result from large format inkjets, all in service to a goal. That goal was creating the best possible photographic print. I still love a beautiful print, but it has become a niche skill. To the broader culture, photography now means billions of technically competent snapshots captured by increasingly sophisticated smart-phone cameras flooding the Internet every single day, each with the impact and lifespan of a just-hatched Mayfly or cicada.

Kind of a negative outlook, but I think I can still enjoy taking purposeful photos with my big camera while allowing others to enjoy snapshots with their smart phone – or even really good solid photos taken with a phone!

Another comment:

Strangely enough, I think it is the internet that lets those “tiny niches” survive. It is a “force multiplier” that allows a much smaller number of practitioners keep the niche alive and thriving to some extent.

When you were the editor of the model railroading magazine, magazines and clubs were the way these niches survived. As time went on and the number of practitioners shrank, magazines folded and clubs have withered and the practitioners moved to a community online where you can have a global community and draw from the whole connected world.

I “belong” to three of those niches: Photography, Garden Scale Model Railroading and HP calculators. I keep current in all three by belonging to a small but active online community. What is interesting, is that while you get your share of trolls, in general, the internet experience is much different than what you hear about in the wide world of the internet.

I don’t use popular social media and prefer the smaller corners of the web. Like dedicated forums, Flickr, community Slacks, and my personal blog. So this resonates with me.

But then again, maybe there’s hope for photography,

Another thing that’s interesting is that photography is unlikely to prove to be a generational phenomenon. Younger people aren’t showing any diminished interest in photography—quite the opposite in fact—they just won’t be practicing it in the way us older enthusiasts accepted as normal when we were young.

Hey, I just said the same thing! Ah, the joys of non-linear writing.

CFXFVWP7V1

My wife bought a pair of AirPods Pro off of someone online. They were brand new, unopened. She looked up the serial number in the listing on Apple’s website. All checked out. She went and bought them for $70.1

When she got home the serial number on the box was different from the listing (CFXFVWP7V1). She doubled checked on Apple’s site. Purchased date of October 2023, with a Limited Warranty until October 2024. Ok, it still all checked out ok. Using Apple’s website to verify a serial number, according to the top Google search result (and common sense/logic), is the best way to check that they are legit. Until she went to use them.

They were fake.

The serial numbers on the individual AirPods are different than what Settings show. They pair up just like a real pair, but switching between the various audio modes does nothing.

Searching on Google, the serial number shows other fake listings (from random folks around the world!) with the same serial number. So I’m writing this post in hopes that I can prevent another innocent person from getting taken advantage of.

Fake as a $3 bill

She ended up buying a real pair off of Amazon. The slightly newer version with USB-C. Can you tell the difference?

This Technology is Bad for You?

Ok, my headline is a little tongue-in-cheek. I’m a technologist and I want to believe that technology has improved our lives. From airplanes to vaccinations to smart phones to light bulbs. However, like everything in life, choices have consequences. Here’s two video essays I recently watched that discuss how the technology you’re using right now 👀 can do you harm. It’s not your fault, we’re still in the infancy of having the capabilities we now have – to broadcast and consume at a global an unending scale – and our squishy human brains are not adapted for this. At. All.

A pretty good summary of why Twitter/Facebook/etc are not “public squares” as traditionally (and in a historically socially-healthy way) conceived.

It’s not just social media that is causing fractures in society. We also don’t share the same popular culture as we once did. Remember when you had to sit down at the same time as every other person in your country to watch the latest episode of a show? And then talk about it at work the next day? That doesn’t happen as much any more. Our own world of shared culture is, well, less shared.

See also Joan Westenberg’s ruminations on the old internet. (Via kottke.org)